
During last month’s Olympic hockey tournament in Vancouver, Alexander Medvedev, the president of the KHL, made it known that his league plans on aggressively pursuing New Jersey Devils forward Ilya Kovalchuk when he becomes a free agent following this season. Medvedev was quoted as saying to ESPN’s Pierre LeBrun, “Yes, yes, because it will be absolutely legal … It’s understood with the leagues that if it’s a free agent, or even a restricted free agent, they could decide where to play. So Kovalchuk has the full right to decide where to play. We are going to negotiate with him and his agents what kind of agreement could be reached.”
It will certainly be an interesting storyline to watch develop should Kovalchuk and the Devils fail to agree on a new contract before July 1.
The NHL rarely — if ever — sees a player of this magnitude, at this age, hit the open market. Kovalchuk, who doesn’t turn 27 until April, is one of the most dynamic, game-changing offensive forces in the league, and not only will there be 30 NHL teams lining up to bid for his services, there will apparently be two leagues entering what will surely be a free agency free-for-all.
Medvedev’s infatuation with two-time 50-goal scorer is obvious. His league desperately needs to add a marquee player, and Kovalchuk, one of the best players from Russia – or any country – will be available to the highest bidder. With Jaromir Jagr, currently the biggest name playing in Russia, looking as if he may make a return to North America after the season, the need for a big-splash acquisition is multiplied for the league. Even if Jagr remains in Russia, another high-profile profile player wouldn’t hurt. The KHL still needs more impact players, and it won’t be able to hitch its wagon to Jagr, currently 38, forever.
But what if it misses out on Kovalchuk? Does it have a Plan B? And if not, who, or what, should it turn to?
So far, the best players to jump ship from the NHL to Russia have been, for the most part, players at the tail end of their careers (Jagr, Sergei Fedorov, Sergei Zubov, etc.) and a number of second-, third- and fourth-tier players. Alexander Radulov would be the exception to those two groups, having gone over at the age of 21 on the brink of a potential star career in Nashville, as well as Nikita Filatov, a former first-round pick that is on loan from the Columbus Blue Jackets. He’s currently averaging close to a point per game (22 points in 26 games) as the youngest player on CSKA Moscow and one of the youngest players in the league.
If the KHL wants to be a truly international league and seriously compete with the NHL, why is it putting all of its eggs in one basket this summer with Kovalchuk? Why not consider attempting to lure a big name North American free agent? It’s a long shot, absolutely. But if it wants to be a league that rivals the NHL – which is supposedly the KHL’s intention – it’s going to have to eventually bring in some non-Russian superstars. It’s a threat to sign some players, yes, but is it really a rival league? At this point, it probably isn’t on the same level as the old WHA, which housed such names as Bobby Hull, Wayne Gretzky, Mark Messier, Rod Langway and Bernie Parent for brief periods of time.
That’s not to say it’s a bad league, because it’s not. It’s clearly the second-best professional hockey league in the world — trailing only the NHL — and is ahead of the Elite leagues in Sweden, Germany, Finland and Switzerland.
But can it ever get to a level close to the NHL? And more importantly, does it even want to?
Let’s say, hypothetically, that instead of going after Kovalchuk (or along with him), the KHL made a serious offer for the only other impact free agent forward that’s expected to hit the market: San Jose’s Patrick Marleau.
That would certainly get the NHL’s attention.
There are, of course, a couple of reasons as to why such a move probably wouldn’t happen.
1) Why would a top-shelf North American free agent want to leave the NHL to play in Russia? As we discussed with Nashville Predators assistant general manager Paul Fenton a couple of weeks ago, one of the biggest draws for European and Russian hockey players to the KHL is the simple fact that it’s their home, or a lot closer to their home, than the United States or Canada.
A North American player would have no such draw, which would leave money as the only deciding factor.
The KHL has been known to throw around the promise of tax-free, and sometimes even rent-free, contracts to entice players. The problem, however, is that the KHL hasn’t exactly been a booming financial success. The league also has a lower salary cap than the NHL, and while some larger contracts are paid up front, some teams have struggled to pay players on time and fulfill their contractual obligations.
There’s not a strong players association, and there have been concerns about the medical treatment players have received, not only following the death of Alexei Cheraponov, but for the manner in which Steve Kariya – brother of Paul Kariya – was carried off the ice on a tarp after hitting his head earlier this season.
2) Like most of the professional leagues in Europe, the KHL has a limit on the number of international import players that can play on a single team. The league limits teams to five imports, only one of which can be a goaltender — only four are permitted to dress on game day — so there are limited opportunities for such players.
Considering the shaky financial situation in which nobody is making money, as well as the restrictions on rosters, is it possible that the KHL, despite its claims of wanting to be a rival for the NHL, has no such intentions? Medvedev has been quoted many times about his desire to have a positive working relationship with the NHL and build a successful league.
So far, it’s been a failure in that respect.
Having said all of that, here’s a thought: what if the KHL’s main focus right now is simply to serve as a tool to help build up Russian hockey for the 2014 Sochi Olympics? The league is run, in part, by state-owned companies, and while the NHL still hasn’t committed to the Sochi games, most of the top Russian players have already said they are taking part whether they have the NHL’s blessing or not. The more big-name Russian players the KHL can sign before then, the less problem it has getting those same players for its national team in 2014 if the NHL decides to keep its season running through February.
Russia is coming off a disappointing showing in the Vancouver Olympics in all sports, with its hockey team leading the way. Its sixth-place finish was its worst since 1956, and was capped off with an embarrassing 7-3 defeat at the hands of long-time rival Canada. The pressure on that team in 2014 is going to be immense.
It’s just a thought, but is it that far-fetched? Russia’s performance in the Olympics has steadily declined over the past four tournaments, going from Silver in ‘98, to Bronze in ‘02, to fourth in ‘06, to sixth in ‘10. The last Gold Medal was 1992 when the Unified Team won it at the Albertville games. Isn’t it possible that Russia could use the KHL, in some way, to help spearhead its efforts to win gold on its home soil in four years?
Regardless of its current intentions, it’s clear that it still has quite a ways to go if it ever wants to be a true “rival” for the NHL.